Words for hiding something from somewhen when they need it

The workers who get these jobs will be, in context, the вЂњluckyвЂќ ones, as the economic contraction will reduce employment. The Post Office might be stripped, further isolating already abandoned and impoverished rural areas, and its work now done by poorly paid contractors without unions. The pandemic seems to have accelerated an economic restructuring, too, in which the service economy is transforming, at least in the US. The ultra-rich are behaving like the ultra-rich, plundering the future, grabbing up the trillions in вЂњquantitative easingвЂќ that the Fed printed, devouring real estate with an eye on future rents, using bail out money for stock buybacks, and amassing nearly inconceivable gains since March. Again, the question - for whom? We are vulnerable to the virus right now and I am wondering how we should think about that vulnerability? The вЂњget worseвЂќ part of the formula is worth some consideration, though not worthy of certainty.

Things have totally changed, will change, are changing. What we were told would go on forever has been proven, in 2020, fragile and illusory. The pandemic doesnвЂ™t really alter this - not incarnationвЂ™s law, poetвЂ™s irony, ruling class deceptions - but it does provide clear evidence of whatвЂ™s up. We are to believe their domination is as natural and unchanging as the sun in the sky, which itself is a lot more changeable than we once thought. Ahistorical sameness is necessary to the status quo because to admit that all this bullshit of the ruinous social order is fleeting is fatal to their interests. These guys do us a favor by compelling us to utter вЂњnoвЂќ to their parroting of the ruling class lie that things canвЂ™t or at least wonвЂ™t change except for the worse. When they moan вЂњItвЂ™s the same, just worse, such vanityвЂќ we get the signal to take up our part and disprove the poetвЂ™s lie, to challenge critically what we might have only absorbed ambiently. Houellebecq, Solomon, et al, are actually engaged in some performative ironic juxtaposition with the undeniable condition of incarnated mutability. When people say вЂњeverything is going to stay the same, but get worseвЂќ it seems more likely they mean вЂњeverything will feel the same, but worse,вЂќ which brings about the question, to whom? Literary men have a tradition of declaring that feeling of unchanging banality to be a fact, all the way back to Solomon at least. I toggle between the two sides, but I wonder five months later how you feel about your reaction versus his.

I am writing this because I want the good in us to break through the layers of hateful nonsense we've been drowning in.вЂќ At the same time Michel Houellebecq wrote a radio essay about how everything was going to stay the same but get worse. в–ј Sam Jaffe Goldstein: At the beginning of the pandemic you wrote a very hopeful short essay that states, вЂњWe face such a strange task, here, to come together in spirit and keep a distance in body at the same time.

Words for hiding something from somewhen when they need it